This is an official email i received from Equality California:
Court to Determine Constitutionality of Prop 8
Today the California Supreme Court granted review in the legal challenges to Proposition 8, which passed by a narrow margin of 52 percent on November 4. In an order issued today, the Court agreed to hear the case and set an expedited briefing schedule. The Court also denied an immediate stay. On November 5, 2008, the National Center for Lesbian Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Lambda Legal filed a lawsuit challenging the validity of Proposition 8 in the California Supreme Court on behalf of six couples and Equality California. The City of San Francisco, joined by the City of Los Angeles, the County of Los Angeles, and Santa Clara County, filed a similar challenge, as did a private attorney in Los Angeles. The lawsuits allege that, on its face, Proposition 8 is an improper revision rather than an amendment of the California Constitution because, in its very title, which was “Eliminates the right to marry for same-sex couples,” the initiative eliminated an existing right only for a targeted minority. If permitted to stand, Proposition 8 would be the first time an initiative has successfully been used to change the California Constitution to take way an existing right only for a particular group. Such a change would defeat the very purpose of a constitution and fundamentally alter the role of the courts in protecting minority rights. According to the California Constitution, such a serious revision of our state Constitution cannot be enacted through a simple majority vote, but must first be approved by two-thirds of the Legislature. Since the three lawsuits submitted on November 5, three other lawsuits challenging Proposition 8 have been filed. In a petition filed on November 14, 2008, leading African American, Latino, and Asian American groups argued that Proposition 8 threatens the equal protection rights of all Californians. On November 17, 2008, the California Council of Churches and other religious leaders and faith organizations representing millions of members statewide, also filed a petition asserting that Proposition 8 poses a severe threat to the guarantee of equal protection for all, and was not enacted through the constitutionally required process for such a dramatic change to the California Constitution. On the same day, prominent California women’s rights organizations filed a petition asking the Court to invalidate Proposition 8 because of its potentially disastrous implications for women and other groups that face discrimination. In May of 2008, the California Supreme Court held that barring same-sex couples from marriage violates the equal protection clause of the California Constitution and violates the fundamental right to marry. Proposition 8 would completely eliminate the right to marry only for same-sex couples. No other initiative has ever successfully changed the California Constitution to take away a right only from a targeted minority group. Over the past 100 years, the California Supreme Court has heard nine cases challenging either legislative enactments or initiatives as invalid revisions of the California Constitution. In three of those cases, the Court invalidated those measures.
You can get complete information regarding the actual case itself from the California courts website.
Related Site
-The Weddings of Year
-Wedding Ideas on Budget
-Wedding Pictures and Decoration
Related Videos :below I show related videos and not so related to this article.
SAFER Executive Director Mason Tvert appears on Fox News Channel's "Happening Now" to discuss California State Legislator Tom Ammiano's proposal to regulate and tax marijuana for recreational adult use. Also appearing in the segment is Drug Free America Foundation Executive Director Calvina Fay, who somehow ties responsible adult marijuana use to human trafficking.
135+ MORE examples of Fox News Bias at http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A3BD2524FE99BD4D
When Fox News' supposedly "straight news" program "Special Report" broadcast a story last week on the DREAM Act currently before the US Congress, "Special Report" spun the DREAM Act as a "nightmare," misreported to whom the DREAM Act applies, and, worst of all, reported on the appeal of last week's 7-0 California Supreme Court decision in favor of immigrant equality without ever reporting the unanimous decision for immigrants' rights itself, as I show in this video.
The clips of Bret Baier and the Fox News report from Mike Emanuel I used come from a segment broadcast on the program "Special Report with Bret Baier" November 16, 2010 (which I have not been able to find online)
The image I show of the Fox News webpage with the September 17, 2010, video titled "The DREAM Act turning into a Nightmare?" is available online at http://video.foxnews.com/v/4341477/dream-act-turning-into-a-nightmare
The text of the DREAM Act I show in this video comes from the Library of Congress' THOMAS page at http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.729:
The image of the November 15, 2010, California Supreme Court decision in Martinez v. Regents of the University of California comes from the webpage at http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S167791.PDF
The image of the "Special Report with Bret Baier" page I show at the end of the video is available online at http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/special-report
Suscrbete va Feed (RSS)
0 comments:
Post a Comment